I just don't get it. How can someone be so difficult and so dumb? And how could FDH have married her?
All I have to say is WTF?
We had P/T conferences on Monday, which actually went well. Whatshername was civil and seemingly medicated.
Tuesday, the meds apparently wore off and the crazy started back up. On our weekends, we take the boys to church and they go to Sunday school. Part of Sunday school is a choir and the choir sings at some of the Sunday services. We got the list of upcoming performances, and a couple of them fall on her weekends. So, FDH sends her an email with the dates and asks if the boys can go. He told the boys that it was up to her on her weekends and he would ask her. He gives her the option of taking them herself or we pick them up Sunday morning, take them to Sunday school/church and then bring them back. Again, asking her since it's her weekend. Well, she has a fit and sends an incredibly nasty email that we never even told her we were signing the boys up for Sunday school and that we shouldn't be putting them in things on her weekends and can't keep "borrowing them" during her time.
Now, she has a "policy" that what she does with the boys when they are with her is her business and she doesn't have to tell us anything. Therefore, there was no reason to tell her about Sunday school since we did it on our weekends. Sunday school is every weekend, but they only go every other weekend. We have no control over the choir performance dates and told the boys that there might be some that they won't be able to go to. I still don't see what the problem is with asking since it's something they like to do, at least that way there is at least the possibility.
Also, FDH has been asking about Mother's Day/Father's Day. We have them for Mother's Day and she has them for Father's Day, but the court order says that the kids should be with the appropriate parent for those two days. Well, she doesn't know what her schedule will be (she doesn't work, so not sure how hard it is to figure out your schedule). Doesn't matter. If she doesn't want them for Mother's Day, that's fine, but FDH is entitled to have them for Father's Day and wants them. Her deciding not to exercise her right to have them doesn't preclude him from exercising his right. Of course the court order is vague as to times, so he sent her an email asking about times. And then another, and one more since she can never seem to answer an entire question. At this point, she thinks it is too much "in person" switching of the children and hasn't really even said that she was willing to let him have the boys at all for Father's Day.
So, he sends another email - again asking about Father's Day and two other dates.
Memorial Day weekend, we are taking the boys out of town. It is our weekend. They have a half day of school on Friday and we want to pick them up there so we can start the drive. Again, the court order is vague as to when the weekend actually starts.
We're getting married August 25. It's her weekend (yeah, I know - with out of town family schedules we didn't have many options). So, he asks if we can have the boys for the wedding. Since he's guessing she doesn't know her schedule yet, he says just let me know if I can have them for the wedding and we can figure out the details of days you'd like to have in exchange as we get closer to the date.
Since she routinely doesn't respond to emails, he says "let me know if you have issues with these dates. If we can't reach an agreement on this, we will need to go to mediation. Please respond by Monday" (giving her 5 days).
So, this morning, FDH gets an email that was apparently not meant for him. Genius sent an email to her attorney whining "but this is the first I heard of this. Can he do this?" (meaning request mediation) The Father's Day thing has been over multiple emails, you've chosen not to answer it. Since you can't answer half of your emails, he's asking once, giving you a deadline to respond and then if there is no response or we can't reach an agreement he will go a different direction. The email clearly stated "let me know if you have any issues" and "IF we can't reach an agreement" then mediation will be requested. So, answer the damn emails, try to compromise and save everyone the cost and frustration of mediation.
Seriously, wtf? How can this stuff be so hard to understand? You don't respond to emails, but then get pissed when you're only told once about something? Why should we be required to ask the same question 4 or 5 times before (maybe) getting a (partial) answer?
Oh, and he's the one who's "disrespectful and rude." She who can't manage to send the boys over with everything they need and then gets pissed when we ask for their library books, who says "yep, they're in the bag" when asked about SS5's sneakers, only for me to open the bag when FDH gets home to see 1(!) sneaker instead of the pair. Who sends them back without things we send over like snowpants without saying a word and when asked, "oh, they must have been left at school" without bothering to send hers over. She who, when he went to pick the boys up at her apartment said (in front of the children) I don't want you in here and then followed up with an email that in the future he is to wait in the car and she'll send the children out.
I really try to be civil and polite, but she's a lazy, evil, crazy bitch who does nothing but complain about what we do, refuses to attempt to co-parent at all and thinks that if she says "I'm not discussing this anymore" than she's right by virtue of having the last word. So, if I say the earth is flat and I'm not going to discuss it anymore, that makes it so?
- sorryilovemydogmore's blog
- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
She never claims that she
She never claims that she didn't get them. She admits to getting them. She just doesn't want to respond.
I think (well more than think but can't definitively say "know) that it's a control thing. She's no better off than when she left, still single and living off the money she gets every month from the "devil" (she actually referred to him as that on facebook, and I'm the devil's cheerleader which I think is awesome!) and basically has no control over her life. But, if she can make FDH jump through 15 hoops and send 5 emails every time something comes up, there's something she can control. Hence his new approach - one email and I'm done. He finally realized that he needs to stop "trying to smooth things over" and just take a business approach to this. It's black and white. No gray. Gray causes issues and I will not spend the next 13 years letting someone else control what goes on in my house.
Oh, actually this was the
Oh, actually this was the first time we asked about Memorial Day weekend and the wedding. He asked a question, gave her a time frame to respond and said if they couldn't agree he was going to request mediation more as a heads up. Not that he was threatening mediation because she didn't respond to something.
In general, it takes several attempts to get an answer from her and he's letting her know that he will only ask a question once from here on. If she doesn't respond, he'll take other action. Apparently she doesn't like the fact that he will no longer keep repeating himself.
But the read receipt is a
But the read receipt is a really good idea anyway. That way, if she misses a deadline to respond and he takes the next step, she can't claim "I didn't know" or "you never said that". I did email him after your suggestion and told him to start doing that. That wasn't really the issue in this case, but a good practice because I can see her pulling that at some point.
Religion is one of five major
Religion is one of five major matters that child custody law addresses. There are five decisions that married-parents make, that the law says neither divorced-parent may unilaterally change--residence, religion, health care, education and recreation.
Here's the way it works:
First, the "status-quo" is determined. What religion did the parents choose for the children when they were married and making joint decisions? That religion is the children's "status-quo-religion," and neither parent may change it unless both parents agree or the court allows it.
If, during the marriage, the parents chose no specific religion for the children, then the "status-quo-religion for the children is "no specific religion," and neither parent may then enroll the children in any specific denomination without the other parent's agreement.
They had agreed on religion
They had agreed on religion and we have not changed it. FDH has been taking them to that church since before they split up. The religion issue itself was already decided. This is an activity sponsored by the church (that she agreed they could attend) and as we take them on our weekends, there's nothing she can do about it.
Since she refuses to communicate about anything she does with the boys, why would we have to tell her about it? I get if it was a different church but that was not the case. It's just her being pissy and hypocritical. She's got a bug up her rear about something so she's going to accuse him of anything she can think of, whether or not there is merit to it.
To the extent that "recreation" doesn't infringe on the other parent's time, that is not something that needs to be agreed to by both parents. We can't sign the boys up for soccer every weekend and make her take them on her weekends, but if we want to sign them up and have them only play every other weekend we can.
"Now, she has a "policy" that
"Now, she has a "policy" that what she does with the boys when they are with her is her business and she doesn't have to tell us anything"
You DO realize that only works one way, don't you? That's her "policy" but I'll bet dollars to donuts it will NEVER be reciprocated.
So medical science has actually cloned the Behemoth??!! WOW!!
Right. Parallel parenting
Right. Parallel parenting (because she refused to co-parent), but only when it suits her. Funny how that means she doesn't have to listen to anything from FDH but is more than happy to send us helpful articles and advice. Particularly the one she sent before SS5 started kindergarten. "How to prepare you child for kindergarten." All things we were doing, and nothing she was doing. But, she is MOTY, after all.
OMG!!!! WE HAVE THE SAME
OMG!!!! WE HAVE THE SAME BM!!!! Im sitting next to my SO saying "you HAVE to read this" Its her all over!!!!
I feel your pain and frustration I really do.