You are here

Step Son Getting Married Issue

LindaKjl's picture

So, my step son got engaged in February. At the end of May they informed my husband and I that they have decided on a September wedding. We thought a year from now. No, THIS September and it is going to be a 300 person wedding. They then went on to inform us how much money our portion for paying for their wedding will be (and it's thousands). Anyway, long story short, I have just found out (via my husband's ex wife's Facebook page) that a bridal shower took place yesterday (which was put on the Bride to be's mother). I obviously was not invited. I am an adult and have never had an issue with my husband's ex. We can most certainly be in the same room together celebrating this event. I am extremely hurt and upset. I am at work and have not told my husband yet. How should I approach this when I go home tonight? P.S. I have never been thanked for the money for the wedding either by either my stepson nor my future step daughter-in-law.

still learning's picture

I agree that the ss may have not known anything about the invitees to the bridal shower, most men are clueless about this sort of thing, as they should be. They do owe you an apology though, you're good enough to pay out but not important enough to attend the shower that all the women in the *family* were likely invited to.

While DH is talking to his son be sure to find out seating and table arrangements so there are no nasty surprises.

ldvilen's picture

Welcome to the World of the Invisible Woman--a SM's World. Adult SKs think that it is all about their mom and dad and mom and dad's money. They'll get an "oops" pass that they accidentally on purpose forgot that dad and SM have been married for 10+ years. You may even make more money than your husband, and may even, as one SM did, pay for your DH's/dad's portion because he was unemployed. Makes no difference. You won't exist, more than likely. Even if dad makes more money than you do, any money he forks over the kids affects you just as much as him. If DH had to contribute $10,000 for the wedding, that means no vacation for you and him that year, less outings, maybe even fewer basics. You see, you are invisible. You are in the way of the one and only "true" family. So, society expects you to suck it up and take it over and over for ma and pa's divorce.

Yeah, the bridal shower should be the least of your concerns. Wait until you see what is planned for the wedding. SM in the back. BM and dad up front, walking down the aisle together. You sitting at the old folks table at the reception sans DH. No pictures allowed of you at all. All pictures taken with DH also have his ex- in them. Minister giving you the evil eye if you even get remotely close to your own husband of XYZ years. Nope. You're supposed to be invisible, except in her husband's bedroom. And, there is a high price to pay when SM comes out and dares to act in public like she is ACTUALLY MARRIED to her DH. God forbid.

Yep. Welcome to the year 2017 1/2, where supposedly all women and men are created equal, unless you're a SM, of course. No rights for you. You're invisible. You don't exist.

Pharlap's picture

Don't forget that if she's remarried, stepdad gets to sit next to her and he in photos during the ceremony as well. Bonus if stepkid involved step daddy in a part of the ceremony like a bio parent. Even when both bios have been present and active in the child's life.

hereiam's picture

They then went on to inform us how much money our portion for paying for their wedding will be

I'm sorry, this is just plain rude and I would not pay one penny towards their wedding.

As far as not inviting you to the the bridal shower, that was rude, also and I would just tell your husband what you've told us. You found out there was a bridal shower and you were not even invited, even though your money is good enough to help pay for the wedding.

Your husband should also know that his son does not have ANY manners. Not even a "thank you"? Nice.

LindaKjl's picture

Yes I have met the bride-to-be's mother and her father. My husband and I had them previously over to our house for a summer cook out dinner and had a wonderful evening with them.

moeilijk's picture

There's no law that says you must be invited to a wedding shower. Just like there is no law that says you need to spend one thin dime of your money if you don't wholeheartedly wish to do so.

Do what you can to gather your money and your dignity, and smile graciously all the way to the nearest cocktail bar.

SM12's picture

It just amazes me how someone can just assume their parents will pay for their wedding. I honestly am amazed. When I got married the first time, I had no intentions of asking my parents for money. They surprised me by purchasing my wedding dress, which was huge. But I never would have considered asking them to pay THOUSANDS. And had I expected it, they would have set that straight right away... NO WAY.

My second wedding was put together in a few short weeks.
I will be damned if I was going to be expected to foot the bill for a grown persons wedding. I would agree to gift my kids a monetary gift of MY choosing to help them toward a honeymoon or future home, but never would I allow them to dictate the amount.

notasm3's picture

I think you were dissed - but I have lived in areas where there was not ONE big bridal shower. A bride had multiple small showers, and they usually were split up by family. One shower with the bride's relatives, one with the groom's relatives, one with the bride's friends, maybe one with the bride's work buddies, etc.

In that situation I would not expect to be invited to all the showers. In fact it's considered rude to invite someone to more than one shower.

But in your case I think you were excluded. So now you know. You don't have to do squat for them.

Disneyfan's picture

Forget the shower.

I'm wondering how you managed to keep from laughing in their faces when they TOLD you how much money you were going to fork over for THEIR wedding. :sick: :sick:

SMforever's picture

Sounds like DH just arbitrarily decided to spend joint marital funds as his contribution to SS wedding.

This is exactly why I keep preaching that in marriages where there are skids, there should be separate finances maintained, meaning each spouse pays his/her own money only toward any skid support. The only funds co-mingled should be mutual living expenses between spouses. Any person who objected to that arrangement wouldn't get the time of day from me.

It's never too late to revert to that arrangement if one spouse proves themself to be an unfair spender. May mean the end of the relationship, but who wants a relationship where one's partner is spending away retirement funds?

Getting left out of showers etc is par for the SM course. Actually, I'm always quite glad to be left out...saves me money! Weddings are way over emphasised anyway.

twoviewpoints's picture

I'm not near as excited over the shower as I was to funding arrangements of the wedding. So who all is funding the wedding? Dad/you, BM, and ? Do I assume the bride-to-be parent/s also? And the bride and groom, they are footing some of the cost too, right?

As to the shower, being it was giving by the bride's mother, I would not get too upset unless I also hear this is the one and only shower tat is being thrown. Of course you and BM could and should have been invited, but it's usually not the bride's mother who host the shower/s. Was this one perhaps really just a bunch of the older female friends of the mother of the bride?

FWIW, no one who orders my cash (and especially the amount I will be giving) with a three month or less notice and does not consult with me? Well, if that wedding hinged on my contribution , let's just say there would be no wedding this September. The unfolding events as you've relayed them is just not how I roll. I don't have a kid or stepkid who would think I do or should either (and yes, DH and I have 5 kids total)

2Tired4Drama's picture

Since you actually had the MOB/FOB over to your home for dinner, it makes this whole situation very distasteful.

It is obvious that the BM takes precedence with the future in-laws since she was invited to the shower. I am sure that the MOB spoke with BM and asked how she felt about having you there. You got your answer.

Just be prepared for more exclusion. Don't expect to be included in anything to do with this wedding or events related to it. Even though you are the wife of the groom's father, that doesn't seem to count for anything.

This is my mantra related to an upcoming SD/skid wedding: "Expect nothing."

Weddings can be a real hot-bed of emotion and turmoil. I plan to just sit back and keep my mouth shut, unless I am flat-out insulted or severely disrespected like being made to sit alone at another table. My SO forked over CONSIDERABLE money for this show, enough to cover the entire wedding AND honeymoon.

I am sure that my SD will only grudgingly include me wherever necessary just enough to keep her dad pacified.

You may want to address your concerns with your DH and see if he can get affirmative answers on what the plans are for seating, etc. This is going to be a large wedding and it's best to know up-front. I've tried getting my SO to ask a few basic questions, like what are the seating plans, but he is scared to death to even ask his princess any questions whatsoever about what she wants to do. That's why I expect nothing.

I've already steeled myself to just quietly get up and walk out if something causes me distress. I will plead a migraine due to all the "excitement." I would rather SD (and her father) have her fairy-tale wedding than create any kind of drama.

notasm3's picture

Back before I gave up speaking to SS and his GF at all I had decided that if they ever got married I'd conveniently have something else to do. A board meeting out of state, a college reunion, some event for my godchild or relative or just a perfect stranger if that's all i could come up with.

I kind of had fun thinking up things that would be more important than their wedding like a craft fair in the next state, Mickey's Not So Scary Halloween Party, dinner with an old friend, Vera Bradley's annual sale, etc.

ldvilen's picture

I respect your opinion so very, very much, but my answer to your last statement would be, "Not me." You see, I think this is what most are counting on, and this is why this sort of behavior continues. Anyone involved with the bridal industry (and it is an industry), knows that SMs can be an issue, and they do think the SMs are an issue. Not them. They know that SM is going to want to at least sit with her husband, and they’ll actually blame the SM for that—wanting to sit with her DH or for expecting to be in a couple of wedding pictures with the couple—whom SM may have known and supported in some, manner, shape or form for years and years.

I honestly feel treating SM or step-dad like an invisible person at these events is not only a form of disrespect but discrimination. Discrimination means the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things. Surely fits SM here. Any other married couple at this event will be treated like a married couple or SOs. Except, for SM. So, no one should feel that if they attend a wedding, and their spouse is Shanghaied, and then they protest, that they have done anyone wrong or are creating drama of any kind. If drama occurs, the one who created the drama is the one who thought it was okay to discriminate and separate DH and his wife, without any notice whatsoever.

ldvilen's picture

Really, Lashy! What do you mean LOL? Seems like you need an education.

I by no means stated that SM had to be in every picture. This is a ridiculous assumption among many. SM says it’d be nice to be in a couple of pictures, and next thing you know everyone is calling her a ho for wanting to be in a couple of pictures with her husband with her SKs.

SM is not a bridemaid’s date, where she and her boyfriend hooked up 3 months ago at the Rag ‘Em, Tag ‘Em bar. If, by chance, bridesmaid has been married to her husband for a while, I doubt bridemaid’s husband ever cooked and cleaned and kissed boo-boos for any length of time for the bride or groom, but maybe he did? Even if bridemaid’s boyfriend, is just a boyfriend, chances are they are permitted to hang out together at the wedding and even be in a couple of candid pictures or videotaped together. That doesn’t happen for a lot of SMs and their husbands.

ALSO, your DH isn't hooked up with some other woman and paraded around with that woman like they are still married. And I bet, if someone did do that, especially without your permission, you'd be the first one screaming bloody murder.

The mistreatment and discrimination of SMs goes way beyond just a couple of pictures. You are sounding like a White Southerner from the 50s when you say: “Its not discrimination you dolt.” I’m sure you think all SMs just like being treated invisible and should have no problem sitting at the back of the bus. Also, it is It's and not Its.