You are here

weird response from therapist

ltman's picture

Submitted by ltman on Fri, 05/31/2013 - 9:46am

Forums: 
General Discussion

To my ss36. His ys4 has been having issues ever since bm left to shack up with an abuser. She left the abuser to try to hook back up with my Ss. She has lied about SS to many people. She's not all there, and yet she has custody.

The 4yo old was acting out at daycare so badly he was referred to therapy.

Then bm started keeping him from Ss saying his therapist thought it best he was out of the picture one day and yelling at him to be more attentive to the kid the next day. She's a nut job and was seeing the same therapist.

Ss wanted more info because the kid has been getting progressively more aggressive to everyone. So he called the therapist to get more info on what he should do for his son. He only asked about his son. The therapist yelled at him that it was highly inappropriate for him to contact about the bm & kid. SS tried to explain he just wanted info about his son. The guy threatened him with police action if he tried to contact him again. WTF?

I thought it weird for a therapist to treat mom & son. And when does a therapist shut out a parent when he has not been an abuser?

Jsmom's picture

Submitted by Jsmom on Fri, 05/31/2013 - 10:56am

CO is what you need...Until things are clarified in a legal document, your husband has no rights.

just.his.wife's picture

Submitted by just.his.wife on Fri, 05/31/2013 - 11:06am

If the "therapist" is being agressive with dad, dad can simply write one letter.

In that letter needs to be the following sentence:
"Father did not give concent for child to be treated by this therapist and is now refusing to give consent due to therapists non professional behavior".

At the bottom needs to be

cc (insert state medical licenseing boards name here)

And mail both letters, to the therapist and to the state.

Either
a) therapist will call dad in a much more professional manner to discuss his child or
b) therapist will stop seeing child which does not sound like a bad thing.

Shaman29's picture

Submitted by Shaman29 on Fri, 05/31/2013 - 11:08am

This happened with DH when Uberskank insisted that their kid have a court appointed attorney in the last custody hearing.

Uberskank met with the attorney first, even though DH had custody. Attorney believe every little bit of poison that came out of the mouths of Uberskank and his kid.

When his kid skipped school for the umpteenth time, DH yelled at her. She got upset, called Uberskank and Uberskank called the attorney. Who in turn called DH (now remember, he had sole custody at the time) and told him he could not yell at his kid for skipping school.

There are some nutters out there and I would insist that the therapist treat only the child but not both, as they are not getting the full story. The BM is also laying the groundwork for sole custody, as the therapist can be called into the proceedings as a character witness.

ltman's picture

Submitted by ltman on Fri, 05/31/2013 - 1:50pm

Thank you all. I've been round and round with him to get things legal. He's afraid she'll drop him completely and disappear again. It did cross my mind she was doing the therapist.