Family portraits
Does anyone else feel like they aren’t supposed to take family pictures without the step-child(ren)? We have recently took some family pictures without my step-son being here, and while I don’t want him to feel left out, I also want pictures with just my family that lives in my house on a daily basis (step-son is out of state and is only here in the summer)...how do other people handle this?
- melis070179's blog
- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
I would take as many as you
I would take as many as you like. Its just a fact of life that this child will not be around for every trip, photo op, or holiday, and you and your family should not have to put your lives on hold because that child is living their lives w/their other family. I can guarantee you they are not putting their lives on hold for you guys.
if youre worried about him feeling left out
then get some new pics next time hes there
other than that, thats really all u can do...ur kids shouldnt have to suffer and not have family pics just bc SS cant be around, either.
"Given the right reasons and the right two people, marriage is a wonderful way of experiencing your life."
~the late great George Carlin
take all you like
This is HUGE area of disagreement in our house. My DH wants everything to be fair and the same, but it can never be. My girls are with us all the time and me/my family take tons of photos. He feels slighted becuase we don't have as many of his daughters who are only with us 1/2 time. However, its not fair for me to NOT take photos because they aren't all there. I'm sure there are plenty of photos at BM's house- they exist even though we don't have access to them. Life goes on when everyone is not around and photos shouldn't try and hide that. Document the fun stuff with photos, whether everyone is there or not.
We do take many "everyday"
We do take many "everyday" pictures with our own camera, but I'm talking professional family portraits...should we only take them once a year when he's here or is it okay to have a session without SS with just the family that lives here on a daily basis? For example, he's usually only here in the summer but this xmas I wanted to take a xmas family picture & send it with xmas cards to our families & friends, but I didn't know if leaving him out of it would be seen as mean? If its better to just not take them at all or is it okay?
I think its ok to do family
I think its ok to do family portraits w/o him. He is only with you guys for a specific season of the year. Its not intentional. If he lived in the next town over, or the next state over, I am sure you would include him. But he doesnt. I am sure that he is in family photos w/his primary family. Why should you guys not be allowed to do your family portraits? Its not like he stays out of family portraits when they are taken where he lives w/the BM.
If anyone should say something to you, ask them WHEN they would like you to get SS into the picture? Ask if he should be photoshopped in. Also, its not like YOU are sending this picture to him to remind him that he is not there w/your family.
Sorry, but I do not see how you can deny yourself this when the circumstances are out of your control.
I say, get the pictures taken and enjoy!
Thanks for everyone's
Thanks for everyone's feedback, I feel better about this now!
Go ahead
and take pictures! I'm not a picture person (hate how I look) but DH insists on taking pictures all the time. We have taken pictures just of us, and with SD. We usually get a pose or two just of each of us, or just DH and SD, so SD can have pics of her dad and BM doesn't get all wiggy at my picture being in her house.
It's not like you're not taking/displaying ANY pictures of your skids. I don't see a darn thing wrong with getting family pictures taken, at any time.
IMO
Take all you want. We are expecting our first child next week and I promise there are going to be tons of pics of just the baby, DH and I. He lives here in our home full time. When the skids are here they are holed up in there rooms for the brief time they are here anyway. At Christmas we are having some family pics taken and I am going to make sure we have some of just DH, myself and baby. We will have some with skids too. I know they are part of the family too but I promise that BM, her DH and skids would not ask to have the baby in their family pics so what is the difference in skids not always being in ours. The opportunity for pics presents itself at many times and most of those times the skids are not here. I will certainly not put my pic taking on hold for them. SO, what's the big deal...
ooh good one LMB!
tu know the baby isnt gonna be included in pics at BMs house, so what is the difference?
"Given the right reasons and the right two people, marriage is a wonderful way of experiencing your life."
~the late great George Carlin
Great advice everyone, we've
Great advice everyone, we've decided to go ahead with the portraits. We just bought a 5 session package to be taken over a 1 year time frame, every couple months, to see how our new baby changes. SS will only be here for one of the sessions, but at least we'll have him in one picture. Good enough for me!